sympathizing with the "New Villain": Morally Ambiguous characters representation and audience perceptions

Author

Lecturer at the Faculty of Mass Communication Cairo University & MSA University, Egypt

Abstract

Moral ambiguity has become an aspect of modern drama characters. Protagonists in modern movies were yesterday’s antagonists, yet with detailed background to trigger empathy. They are not purely bad and can do both good and bad things. A scholarly interest can be detected in recent studies to analyze the shift from the traditional narrative to a more progressive and complicated one, from a clear-cut between good and evil, to a context that presents the evil personality as complicated and not simple, providing character background and encouraging people not to rush judging them, and even sympathizing with them. Therefore, audience perception of the villain characters, anti-heroes, and morally ambiguous characters has changed correspondingly. The disposition theory explains the moral judgment of the characters through their actions; accordingly, the audience will form favorable or unfavorable attitudes towards them.  The relationship between character morality and audience liking is another raised issue due to the subversions of the character behavior. The expectancy violation theory EVT explained this perspective as the audience may positively perceive the villain character, if he behaved in a more moral way than what was expected from him. Perceived realism, character liking, and enjoyment are also related to character moral evaluation. The current study aims to examine the representation of the villain in modern drama, what can be called the “New Villain”, especially in movie sequels and serial dramas, in which these characters became more complex, humanified and relatable. A qualitative approach through a focus group discussion is conducted to investigate audience perception of the evil characters, if they really sympathize with them, why and in which context.

Keywords

References

Aertsen, V., (2017). Sympathy for fictional characters: an examination of the factors      involved from a social psychology and cognitive film theory perspective. doxa. comunicación, no 25, pp. 107-128.
Aronson, E. (1969). Some antecedents of interpersonal attraction. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (17, pp. 143–173). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Bonus, J. A., Matthews, N. L., & Wulf, T. (2021). The Impact of Moral Expectancy Violations on Audiences’ Parasocial Relationships with Movie Heroes and Villains. Communication Research, 48(4), 550–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219886516
Campo, M. (2017). Sympathy for the devils: An analysis of the villain archetype since the nineteenth Century. A Thesis Presented to Texas A&M International University. Retrieved from: https://tamiu-ir.tdl.org/bitstream/handle/2152.4/115/MARTINDELCAMPO-THESIS-2017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y 
Coverdale, J. Naim, R.  (2010). The Joker: A Dark Night for Depictions of Mental Illness. Academic Psychiatry. 34.(2):145-9. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315966569_Sensing_Heroes_and_Villains_Character-Schema_and_the_Disposition_Formation_Process/stats   
Ewald. J (2017). The Joker: A Character Study of a Modern Madman. Retrieved from: https://rc.library.uta.edu/uta-ir/bitstream/handle/10106/26853/EWALD-THESIS-2017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Farahbod. M. (2016). From Hag to Heroine: The Evolution Of The Female Villain In Disney’s Frozen And Maleficent. A Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2cbb/cc43d0c15598285c5744be08765bd241b819.pdf  
Frazer, R., Moyer-Gusé, E., & Grizzard, M., (2022). Moral Disengagement Cues and Consequences for Victims in Entertainment Narratives: An Experimental Investigation. Media Psychology, 25:4, 619-637, DOI: 10.1080/15213269.2022.2034020
Freud, S., (1964a) [1923]. The ego and the id. In: J. Strachey (ed. and trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 19: 13-66. London: Hogarth Press.
Hasseler, T & McClure. (2014). The Evolution of the Villain in American Cinema From the 1950s to the Present. The Honors Program Senior Capstone Project. Retrieved from: https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=honors_english  
Hersko, T. (October 15, 2021). "'Lucifer Reclaims Viewership Throne in Nielsen's Latest Streaming Report". indiewire.com.
Hoffner, C. and J. Cantor, (1991). Perceiving and responding to mass media characters. In: J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes, 63-101. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hoorn, J. F., & Konijn, E. A. (2003). Perceiving and experiencing fictional characters: An integrative account. Japanese Psychological Research, 45, 250–268.
Johnson, A. (2016). Evil in The Wonderful Wizard of Oz and Wicked. Retrieved from https://www.etbu.edu/sites/default/files/2018-10/hp2016johnsona.pdf
Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, J. (2019). “A Structure of Antipathy: Constructing the Villain in Narrative Film”. The Journal of Movies and Mind. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332536489_A_Structure_of_Antipathy_Constructing_the_Villain_in_Narrative_Film
Krakowiak, K. M. & Tsay, M. (2011). The role of moral disengagement in the enjoyment of real and fictional characters. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 4, 90–101.
Krakowiak1, K. M., & Oliver, M.B., (2012). When Good Characters Do Bad Things: Examining the Effect of Moral Ambiguity on Enjoyment. Journal of Communication. 62 (2012) 117–135. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01618.x
Ditto, P. H., Pizarro, D. A., & Tannenbaum, D. (2009). Motivated moral reasoning. In D. M. Bartels, C. W. Bauman, L. J. Skitka, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Moral judgment and decision making (pp. 307–338). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)00410-6
Plantinga, C. (2002). Cognitive Film Theory: An Insider’s Appraisal. Cinémas, 12(2), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.7202/024878ar
Raney, A.A., Schmid, H., Niemann, J., & Ellensohn, M. (2009). Testing Affective Disposition Theory: A Comparison of the Enjoyment of Hero and Antihero Narratives.
Sapolsky, B., (1979). Unpublished data. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Shafer, D., M., & Raney, A., A. (2012). Exploring How We Enjoy Antihero Narratives. Journal of Communication 62 (2012) 1028–1046. Retrieved from: doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01682.x 
Sim, S. (2018). Transformation Of the Villain in Hollywood. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies (IntJCSS), 4. (2). Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330413126_Transformation_Of_The_Villain_In_Hollywood
Smith, A., (1971) [1759]. The theory of moral sentiments. New York: Garland.
Tannenbaum, P.H., (1980). Entertainment as vicarious emotional experience. In: P.H. Tannenbaum (ed.), The entertainment functions of television, 107-131. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wispé, L., (1987). History of the concept of empathy. In: N. Eisenberg and J. Strayer (eds.), Empathy and its development, 17-37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zillmann, D., (1980). Anatomy of suspense. In: P.H. Tannenbaum (ed.), The entertainment functions of television, 133-163. I-Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zillmann, D., (1983). Disparagement humor. In: P.E. McGhee and J.H. Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of humor research, Vol. 1: Basic issues, 85-107. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Zillmann, D., (1991). Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In: J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (eds.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes, 135-167. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
Zillmann, D., and J. Bryant, (1975). Viewer's moral sanction of retribution in the appreciation of dramatic presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 11,572-582.
 Zillmann, D., and J.R. Cantor, (1977). Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13, 155-165.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics