Gender in Conflict: The Semiotics of Afghan Women photos after “Taliban offensive 2021” in Newswires

Author

Lecturer, Mass Communication Dept., Faculty of Arts, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

Abstract

Gender studies are a branch of interdisciplinary studies that has received increasing attention in the last decade. This field has developed through the new social movements, in addition to conflicts and wars. So, the identity and the role of gender in conflict zone create a new dimension in framing the events and defining them. Violence leads to sub-issues related to the visual framing of women, such as; their social rights, psychological effects and trauma as well as political and economic pressures that make women vulnerable to exploitation methods and repressive practices. Terrorist and extremist groups, led by ISIS, for example, have practiced many methods of suppressing the freedoms of women in besieged areas, in addition to recruiting others, and arguments that contradict the teachings of the Islamic religion and human rights.
Afghan women are living through the worst repressive periods in the history of Afghanistan, since the Taliban announced their alliance with anti-government groups, to launch their armed attack on the Afghan capitals and states. On the 15th of August 2021, the capital Kabul has fallen and the Afghan President, Ashraf Ghani, fled to the UAE. The Taliban's extremist policies and discriminatory practices against women are known. The horror of the 1990s has returned back again to the lives of Afghan women, threatening their future.
This study is an attempt to analyze the semiotics determines of Afghan women photo coverage after “Taliban offensive 2021” in the photo press agencies; EPA, AFP and AP. The photo coverage represented the Afghan women as a protester, refugee, solider, and   mother and all these roles stand against discrimination and inferiority.

Keywords

References

- Abdel Wahab, A. (2003). “Theory of Cultural Capital”. Literature and Criticism 20(217):122 – 137.
- Adkins, L. (2003). “Reflexivity: Freedom or habit of gender?”. Theory, Culture & Society 20(6): 21–42.
- Baczko, A. & Dorronsoro, G. (2021). “Thinking about civil wars with and beyond Bourdieu: State, capital and habitus in critical contexts”. Journal of Classical Sociology, 1–23.
- Barthes, R. (1977). “Rhetoric of the image”. In: Barthes R (ed.) (1982) Image, Music, Text. Hill & Wang, 32–51.
- Barthes, R. (1968). “Elements of Semiology”, Text. Hill & Wang.
- Berger, A. (1995). “Cultural Criticism: A Primer of Key Concepts”, SAGE Publications.
- Bourdieu, P. (1990). “The Logic of Practice”. Stanford University Press.
- Bouzida, F. (2014). “The semiology analysis in media studies - Roland Barthes Approach”. International Conference on     Social Sciences and Humanities,1001-1007.
- Chappman, S. & Christopher. R. [eds.] (2009). “Key ideas in linguistics and the philosophy of language”. Edinburgh   University Press.
- Coleman, R. (2008). ‘Things That Stay’ Feminist theory, duration and the future”. Time & Society, 17(1): 85–102.
- Cullinane, M. (2010). “Whose Frame Is It Anyway? A Semiotic Analysis of RTÉ Television News”. Critical Social Thinking: Policy and Practice, 2: 1-18.
- Daulatzai, A. (2006). “Acknowledging Afghanistan Notes and Queries on an Occupation”. Cultural Dynamics, 18(3): 293–311.
- Davies, Amy J. (2016). “How Does Violence Against Women Manifest? The Case of Post-Conflict Afghanistan”. E-International Relations, 1-6.
- Duriesmith, D. & Meger, S. (2020). “Returning to the Root: Radical feminist thought and feminist theories of international relations”. Review of International Studies, 46 (3): 357-375
- Entman, Robert M. (1993). “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm”. Journal of Communication,43(4): 51-58.
- Fahmy, S. & Neumann R. (2012).  “Analyzing the Spell of War: A War/Peace Framing Analysis of the 2009 Visual Coverage of the Sri Lankan Civil War in Western Newswires” Mass Communication and Society, 15:169–200.
- Fahmy, S. (2010). “Contrasting visual frames of our times: A framing analysis of English- and Arabic-language press coverage of war and terrorism”. The International Communication Gazette, 72(8): 695–717.
- Fahmy, S. (2005). “Photojournalists' and Photo Editors' Attitudes and Perceptions: The Visual Coverage of 9/11 and the Afghan War”. Visual Communication Quarterly, 12(3-4):146-163.
- Fahmy, S. (2004). “Picturing Afghan Women: A Content Analysis of AP Wire Photographs during the Taliban Regime and after the Fall of the Taliban Regime”.  Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies, 66(2): 91–112.
- Fan, Jiang-Ping (2006). “Charles Morris’s Semiotic Model and Analytical Studies of Visual and Verbal Representations in Technical Communication”. Technical Writing and Communication, 36(2): 121-139.
- Flax, J. (1987). “Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory”. Signs Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 12 (4): 621-643.
- Handrahan, L. (2002). “Gendering Ethnicity: Implications for Democracy Assistance”. Taylor & Francis.
 - Handrahan, L. (2004). “Conflict, Gender, Ethnicity and Post-Conflict Reconstruction”. Security Dialogue, 35(4): 429–445.
- Hirudayaraj, M. & Shields, L. (2019). “Feminist Theory: A Research Agenda for HRD”. Advances in Developing Human     Resources, 21(3): 319–334.
- Jubran, Shahnaz Y.  (2005). “Gender and Citizenship in Palestine”.  Birzeit University Master Thesis.
- Khattak, Saba G. (2004).  “Adversarial Discourses, Analogous Objectives Afghan Women’s Control”. Cultural Dynamics, 16(2/3): 213–236.
- Laustsen, C. B. (2008). “The camera as a weapon: On Abu Ghraib and related matters”. Journal for Cultural Research, 12(2): 123–142.
- Lay, K. & Daley, James G. (2007). “A Critique of Feminist Theory”. Advances in Social Work, 8 (1): 49-61.
- Lorber, J. (2000). “Using gender to undo gender A feminist degendering movement”. Feminist Theory, 1(1): 79–95.
- Lorber, J. (1997). “The variety of feminisms and their contributions to gender equality”. Oldenburg.
- Lubkemann, Stephen C.. (2008 a). “Culture in Chaos: An Anthropology of the Social Condition in War”. University of Chicago Press.
- Lubkemann, Stephen C., (2008 b). “Involuntary Immobility: On a Theoretical Invisibility in Forced Migration Studies”. Journal of Refugee Studies, 21 (4): 454–475.
- Mannell, J., Grewal, G., Ahmad, L. & Ahmad, A. (2021). “A Qualitative Study of Women’s Lived Experiences of Conflict and Domestic Violence in Afghanistan”. Violence Against Women, 27(11): 1862–1878.
- Mitra, S. (2020). “Picturing Afghan Women’ for Western audiences: The Afghan perspective”. Journalism, 21(6):800–  820.
- Mitra, S. (2014). “Rethinking the use of visuals for the purposes of peace journalism”. Communication and Conflict Online, 13(2): 1–15.
- Mottier, V. (2004). “Pragmatism and Feminist Theory”. European Journal of Social Theory, 7(3): 323–335.
- Nadira, R. (2018). “Roland Barthes’ Denotation, Connotation, and Myth in The Change of Four Starbucks Logos: A Study of Semiotics”. University of Darma Persada, Jakarta.
- Nicholas, L. & Shelley, A. (2021). “Introduction: ‘Remembering Feminist Theory Forward’” Feminist Theory, 22(2): 159–164.
- Rasul, A.  and McDowell, Stephen D.  (2015). “Images of oppression: An analysis of the coverage of Afghan women in time and Newsweek after 9/11”. The Journal of International Communication, 21(1): 21–37.
- Renzulli, I. (2017). ‘Women and peace’: A human rights strategy for the women, peace and security agenda”. Quarterly of Human Rights 35(4): 210–229.
- Resolution 2596 (2021). Adopted by the Security Council at its 8862nd meeting, on 17 September 2021 UN. https://undocs.org/en/S/RES/2596(2021)
- Rodriguez, L. & Dimitrova, Daniela V. (2011). “The levels of visual framing” Journal of Visual Literacy 30(1): 48–65.
- Ross-Sheriff, F. (2006). “Afghan Women in Exile and Repatriation Passive Victims or Social Actors?”. Journal of Women and Social Work, 21 (2): 206-219.
- Serbia, Katy P. and Aiello. G. (2020). “Visualizing the politics of appearance in times of democratization: An analysis of the 2010 Belgrade Pride Parade television coverage”. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(2):165–183
- Swartz, David L. & Zolberg, Vera L. (2005) “After Bourdieu Influence, Critique, Elaboration” Springer.
- Viterna, J. (2013). “Women in War: The Micro-Processes of Mobilization in El Salvador”. Oxford University Press.
- Voet, R. (1998). “Social-Liberal Citizenship”. In: Bryan S. Turner, ed. Feminism and Citizenship. Sage publications, 31- 44.
- Vukoičić, J. (2013). “Radical feminism as a discourse in the theory of conflict”. Sociological discourse, 3(5): 33 – 49 DOI 10.7251/SOCEN1305033V
- Wilen, Evelina J. (2021). “Ethics and political imagination in feminist theory”. Feminist Theory, 22(2): 268–283
- Yadav, P, (2021). “Can women benefit from war? Women’s agency in conflict and post-conflict societies”. Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 58(3): 449–461.
- Zarzycka, M. & Kleppe, M. (2013). “Awards, archives, and affects: tropes in the World Press Photo contest 2009–11”. Culture & Society, 35(8): 977–995.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics